The 20th Berkshire Conference on the History of Women, Genders, and Sexualities

Well-Being & Social Justice: Co-creating Kitchen Table History

Thursday-Sunday, June 18 - 21, 2026
Northwestern University, Evanston, IL

Deadline: Friday, January 31, 2025

What does a well society – or wellness in a socially just society – look like? 

These are profound questions of great magnitude and consequence whether we are examining the past or abiding in the present. And they are quite definitely weighty matters as we consider and construct, right here and now, our individual and collective human- and eco-futures.

We invite historical, intellectual, artistic, activist, and world-building contributions that define and explore wellness, well-being, and care in relationship to the personal, interpersonal, societal, human-centric, and eco-centric.

At the 2026 Big Berks, we are starting from these three foundational premises: We want to get well. We know it’s a weighty matter. And we want to get clearer about what this means by investigating, dialoguing, and funning together. In the tradition of Kitchen Table Press (Barbara Smith, Beverly Smith, and Audre Lorde), we welcome you to sit with us to be in conversation to co-create kitchen table history.

We invite you—national and international scholars, activists, and artists of all persuasions, and especially graduate students and early career colleagues—to collaborate and be nourished and nourish each other.

You might consider the following prompts:

  • Historical narratives, interpretations, and analyses we create: shifting frameworks and “states of mind” toward wellness.
  • Re-imagining power and the -isms, informed by our lives, to create a more holistic history and historical record. 
  • Decentering people as the sole focus of history: exploring alternate approaches such as eco-centric realities (e.g. remembering and belonging linked to microbes, animals, ecology, and the Earth).
  • Investigating strategies of the past to deal with local and world political systems and their discriminatory, unequal, oppressive, and dystopian contexts.
  • Healing from trauma, harm, and toxic environments: identifying ideological dogmatism, the ill-politics of revenge interpersonally and systemically; carceral systems and prison abolition; gracelessness in the wake of conflict and austerity, eco-annihilation, etc.
  • Struggles for embodied physical autonomy and mental wellness, including reproductive justice; disability studies; impacts of pandemics, etc.
  • Strengthening relationships between healing justice and structural transformation, including urban excavations and immigration; public health and anti-gentrification work; homelessness; environmental justice as human justice, etc.
  • Connecting individual health to social, economic, and political health.
  • Be guided by joy, love, collective care modalities, improvisation, collaboration as well as liberatory work within systems of spirituality, religious, sacred communities including freedom lineages and praxis.
  • Engage the questions – What is ill-being, what creates it, and how can we break cycles of ill-being – as a way to think deeply about how we sustain wellness in its stead. 
  • Explore how culture, art, and music can create new worlds, as well as illuminate connections and pathways to wellness in activist, academic, and policy spaces. 
  • Reaffirm the morals, ethics, principles, and aspirations for scholarship and community-engaged work and how that ultimately connects to our vision of a well world.
  • Recommit to activism and resistance at the local, global, and transnational levels.
  • Or other related topics!

We welcome submissions that explore the prompts above while also paying attention to what we are calling “cross-category meta-themes” such as race and imperialism; gender and sexuality; class, poverty, and economic systems; geography and place; compassion and courage; and accessibility and disabilities. We encourage submissions that use interdisciplinary methodological, pedagogical, and digital humanities approaches that engage up to three of the themes listed below.

Please begin by selecting the format of your proposal. You can choose to submit a single paper, traditional panel, roundtables, interactive workshop, lightning session, curriculum discussion/workshop, or other formats. Once you begin your submission you will be required to select 1-3 of the following themes in order of relevance.

CONFERENCE SUBTHEMES: 

  •       The Art of Interpretive Work: Excavating, Creating, and Complicating Historical Narratives
  •       Power, Economy, Political Ecosystems
  •       Marginalized Identities, Global Majority Resistance, and Justice Agendas 
  •       History, Practices, Policies of Physical and Mental Health
  •       Joy, Love, Healing, and Collective Care
  •       Life Writing and Other Sources of Community-Based Intellectual History
  •       Repair: Naming Ill-Being, Suffering, and Struggling as a Path Toward Transformation
  •       Culture, Art, World-building, and Enacting Different Futures
  •       Collaborations: Community-based Research and Feminist Engagement

The 2026 Berkshires conference will have a small theater setting for the ongoing screening of films submitted for viewing at the conference. To submit a film to be included as part of the screening, we offer a separate form on the submission site to provide required information for the film along with information for the format required to be included in the screening.

Submissions for the 2026 conference will open on Monday, 16 September 2024 and end on Friday, 31 January 2025. For more information, please email: execadmin@berksconference.org

The Berks is committed to encouraging new scholarship, especially by graduate students. If your session includes at least three presentations by graduate students and you would like your session flagged, please check “emergent scholars” on your session submission.

The Program Committee actively promotes the full and equitable inclusion of racial and ethnic minorities, religious minorities, people with disabilities, and LGBTQ+ people. To that end, the Big Berks Officers and Trustees, 2026 Program Co-Chairs, and Program Committee encourage session proposals that include diverse participants in various career paths such as  activists, artists, filmmakers, and academics of various ranks (i.e. senior and junior scholars, public historians, graduate students, independent historians, and historically-grounded scholars in any discipline). 

The Program Co-Chairs and Program Committee encourage the submission of complete sessions. When this is not possible, single papers will be accepted and then  added to the program where appropriate.

To begin a submission, select a presentation type below:

Please note that all submissions require at least one abstract, and a 1-page CV for each participant.

  1. SINGLE PAPER

  2. CURRICULUM DISCUSSIONS/WORKSHOP

  3. LIGHTNING SESSIONS

    Lightning Sessions are an opportunity for five to seven scholars to deliver very short presentations of their work (about five minutes each in length) followed by a ten to fifteen minute comment pulling together the themes of the session. This format is ideal if a group wants to explore a range of perspectives on an issue, get a broad sense of the state of the field on a topic, or offer several different answers to a larger question or problem. Lightning session organizers must submit a 250-word session abstract that describes the overall questions and goals of the session, as well as abstracts for each paper in the session. Paper abstracts, written by the individual presenters and submitted by the session organizer, should explain the presentation's argument and specific contribution to scholarship in the field.

  4. ROUNDTABLE DISCUSSIONS

    Roundtables are structured discussions revolving around field specific themes and questions; the session consists of three to five discussants and a moderator, who takes an active role in the session. The roundtable is not a forum for the presentation of short papers; discussants may not read papers and may prepare no more than 3-5 minute responses to the questions being discussed. The purpose of this format is discussion and interchange among a group of scholars about a debate, question, or issue in the field. Participants will speak to each other rather than from a podium. The moderator will pose the questions and control the time given to each discussant to respond. After everyone on the panel has spoken and engaged with other panelists, the moderator will open the discussion up for participation by audience members.

  5. TRADITIONAL PANELS

    Traditional panels may consist of either three 20-minute papers, a chair, and an organizer, OR three 15-minute papers, a chair, an organizer, and a commenter. The chair's role is to introduce the papers, while the respondent's is to provide 10-15 minutes of commentary on the papers. Presenters will be held to stated time limits by the chair to ensure time for at least a 30-minute question-and-answer period. All panel proposals must include a chairperson (who may also serve as respondent). All panel organizers must submit a 250-word session abstract that describes the overall questions and goals of the session, as well as abstracts for each paper in the session. Paper abstracts, written by the individual scholars and submitted by the session organizer, should explain the presentation's argument and specific contribution to scholarship in the field.

  6. WORKSHOPS

    These are panels in which the papers are pre-circulated. They must be completed and posted online by April 1, 2020 and all panelists (and possibly audience members) will read the papers in advance. Workshops may include up to 7 participants and a commentator. Panelists' 5-7 minute presentations will highlight key questions or problems in their papers. Commentators address each paper and talk about common themes for 10-15 minutes. Panelists engage in back-and-forth discussion with audience members and other panelists about their work. All panel organizers must submit a 250-word session abstract that describes the overall questions and goals of the session, as well as a 250-word abstract for each paper in the session. The paper abstracts, written by the individual scholars and submitted by the session organizer, should explain the presentation's methodology, sources, argument and specific contribution to scholarship in the field.

  7. OTHER FORMAT

    1. FILM SCREENING

    2. VOLUNTEER